Wedding photographers and editors.
Jsh Dawkins
Hello everybody.
I noticed that some photographers are completely floppy. Several times I encountered the case that the photographer made really good photos but did not edit them.
What do you think: is it better to address third-party wedding-retouching companies..
OR
Is it better to contact the photographer for photo editing?
Browse Gardening and Landscaping Stories on Houzz See all Stories
Working With Pros
How to Hire an Architectural Photographer
By Fred Albert
Pro to pro: Great project photos can boost business. Get the details on finding the right photographer for your project
Full Story
How to Photograph Your House
Small-Business Savvy: Photograph Products Like a Pro
Take impressive photos of your work for a website, a portfolio or packaging with any camera and these 5 tips
Full Story
How to Photograph Your House
Meet 4 Basic Types of Home Photographers
Capture the details of your home's architecture or a fleeting moment — just don't expect both from the same photographer
Full Story
We design, build and renovate in the most exquisite of fashions. Our team of revolutionaries is dedicated to... Read More
Peabody Landscape Group was founded in 1979 by Douglas & David Peabody. Our commitment is to carefully listen and... Read More
The photographer should, within reason, satisfy you. But when you say the photographer didn't edit the photos, what specifically do you mean? Do you mean that the colors need to be adjusted? The shots should be cropped? Or what?
Drive-by or scammer, apparently.
Drive-by, yes, but scam??? I don't think so.
You're likely right, sushi. It just seemed like a random question, not one about his/her own photos and photographer experience. I wondered if he's actually a photographer. Anyway, Jsh seems to have flown the coop.